Keyword summary
89% 16 analyzed articles/videos 10,681 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tucker Carlson results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 6,498 hits . Analysis detected 67,911 faulty-reasoning hits from 46,364 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,730 of 37,533 keywords). This Tucker Carlson is better (less manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group. Tucker Carlson
Keyword details
Total words: 46,364
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.4% percentile 2.8% BS Score16 analyzed articles46.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst