Keyword summary
28% 13 analyzed articles/videos 7,957 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Theft results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 3,019 hits . Analysis detected 19,593 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,144 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (33,740 of 37,533 keywords). This Theft is better (less manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group. Theft
Keyword details
Total words: 26,144
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score13 analyzed articles26.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst