Author summary
36% 1 analyzed article/video 1,119 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Salonga results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 168 hits . Analysis detected 2,043 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,357 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,370 of 6,628 authors). This Robert Salonga is better (less manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group. Robert Salonga
Author details
Total words: 3,357
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.4% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Personal Incredulity: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst