New York Pastry Shop Owner Shares Compilation of Alleged Thefts: “Customers Will Have to Ask for It Behind the Counter” 66%

By Akil Rashid63%

7/23/2026, 11:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 29% saturation with 155 hits. Analysis detected 965 faulty-reasoning hits from 534 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 59.7% and a BS Rank of 66% (7,374 of 21,198 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the article peer group.

A video shared on X is drawing attention after a New York pastry shop owner posted surveillance footage that she says shows multiple thefts inside her store. 
The owner compiled several clips of alleged shoplifting incidents, all of which appear to involve Black individuals, prompting discussion in the comments about the repeated thefts and the impact on her business. 
The video has received more than 5 million views since it was reposted yesterday by X user @Liberfach0. 
While some commenters blamed the shop owner for displaying products near the entrance, others focused on the repeated thefts shown in the footage and debated how businesses should respond to incidents like these. 
The video began with clips of different people, mostly men, simply walking into the pastry shop, helping themselves to a variety of pastries and bread parcels, and walking out unbothered. 
The multiple thefts committed by the criminals ranged from different age groups, all fully aware of their actions, and some returning for seconds. 
At the start of the video, one man of African-American descent walked into the shop, snatched a pastry, then turned swiftly and headed for the door when he realized he was being recorded. 
Meanwhile, a woman yelled, “I’ll call the cops!” 
Another man shown in the footage entering the shop, grabbing two parcels of bread stationed near the entrance, and walking out. 
Bear in mind, these alleged thefts are being committed in the presence of other customers who are either seated or leaving after a purchase. 
As they filmed another robbery in action, other patrons enjoying their meals were actually watching in disbelief as the woman yelled, “Put it back! 
Put it back!” 
But her shouts fell on deaf ears as the individuals ignored her and continued bagging their unpaid items. 
One X user suggested, “Stop putting stuff out that can easily be grabbed at this point. 
Customers will just have to ask for it behind the counter.” 
Several commenters suggested moving products behind the counter to reduce theft. 
Another commenter wrote, “Simple solution: Pick up window and local deliveries. 
It’s the only way to save the store until law and order in NYC is restored.” 
The employees appear frustrated during several of the incidents. 
Several commenters expressed concern about the financial impact repeated thefts could have on a small business. 
One commenter wrote, “Imagine going into debt to start a business, busting your ass every single day to generate what’s needed to pay for products, employees, rent, taxes, and utilities. 
And these good-for-nothings steal from you every day, and you can’t do a damn thing about it. 
Tomorrow, when it all goes bust, everyone loses.” 
The Daily Dot was unable to independently verify the claims made in the viral X post or the circumstances surrounding the surveillance footage shared by the bakery owner. 
Sign up to receive the Daily Dot’s Internet Insider newsletter for urgent news from the frontline of online. 
The post New York Pastry Shop Owner Shares Compilation of Alleged Thefts: “Customers Will Have to Ask for It Behind the Counter” appeared first on The Daily Dot . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 5.2%dailydot.com: 4.3%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.7%dailydot.com: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Akil Rashid: 3.7%dailydot.com: 4.2%Availability Heuristic3.4%This article: 6.0%Akil Rashid: 4.2%dailydot.com: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic6.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.9%dailydot.com: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 12.2%Akil Rashid: 2.0%dailydot.com: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias12.2%This article: 3.7%Akil Rashid: 5.6%dailydot.com: 4.9%Framing Effect3.7%This article: 8.8%Akil Rashid: 0.8%dailydot.com: 0.6%Loss Aversion8.8%This article: 2.1%Akil Rashid: 0.5%dailydot.com: 0.5%Status Quo Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 1.4%dailydot.com: 1.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 12.2%Akil Rashid: 1.9%dailydot.com: 1.3%Pessimism Bias12.2%This article: 14.8%Akil Rashid: 8.8%dailydot.com: 8.7%Negativity Bias14.8%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.5%dailydot.com: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Akil Rashid: 2.5%dailydot.com: 2.6%Fundamental Attribution Error5.1%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Akil Rashid: 1.2%dailydot.com: 1.5%In-Group Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 2.4%dailydot.com: 1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 1.7%dailydot.com: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.8%dailydot.com: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.7%dailydot.com: 0.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.3%dailydot.com: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Akil Rashid: 2.9%dailydot.com: 2.0%Ad Hominem3.2%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 2.0%dailydot.com: 1.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 4.1%Akil Rashid: 2.5%dailydot.com: 2.3%False Dilemma4.1%This article: 4.5%Akil Rashid: 2.7%dailydot.com: 0.8%Slippery Slope4.5%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.5%Akil Rashid: 11.1%dailydot.com: 8.9%Hasty Generalization7.5%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.4%Akil Rashid: 2.2%dailydot.com: 2.4%Bandwagon3.4%This article: 16.3%Akil Rashid: 7.6%dailydot.com: 7.1%Appeal to Emotion16.3%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 1.4%dailydot.com: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 1.6%dailydot.com: 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.1%Akil Rashid: 1.6%dailydot.com: 1.8%Burden of Proof5.1%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.3%dailydot.com: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.5%Akil Rashid: 4.7%dailydot.com: 7.3%Anecdotal4.5%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 14.4%Akil Rashid: 1.3%dailydot.com: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)14.4%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.7%dailydot.com: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.2%dailydot.com: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 29.0%Akil Rashid: 2.9%dailydot.com: 4.9%Unattributed Quote29.0%This article: 6.2%Akil Rashid: 3.1%dailydot.com: 3.4%Quote-first Misdirection6.2%This article: 5.1%Akil Rashid: 5.4%dailydot.com: 3.9%Biased Writer Voice5.1%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 3.8%dailydot.com: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 0.2%dailydot.com: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Akil Rashid: 2.5%dailydot.com: 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Akil Rashid: 2.2%dailydot.com: 2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.4%

534 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.