Former accountant laundered $5.3 million stolen from Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta 5%

By WSBTV.com News Staff7%

7/23/2026, 9:50:20 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 131 faulty-reasoning hits from 246 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 20.6% and a BS Rank of 5% (20,799 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 95.00% of the article peer group.

A 66-year-old former Certified Public Accountant from Atlanta was sentenced yesterday to years in federal prison. 
Ronald Deabler, of Atlanta, was convicted of conspiring to launder $5.3 million stolen from Children’s Health Care of Atlanta, Inc. 
He was sentenced to four years in prison. 
U.S. 
Attorney Theodore S. 
Hertzberg stated that Deabler leveraged his knowledge of the banking system to launder the millions of dollars. 
The funds were stolen from a not-for-profit pediatric health care system dedicated to the welfare of Georgia’s infants, children and teens. 
“Criminals who steal from a children’s hospital are not just committing financial fraud—they are exploiting an institution that exists to care for vulnerable children and support their families,” said Marlo Graham, Special Agent in Charge of FBI Atlanta. 
Graham added that Deabler chose to use his financial expertise to hide and distribute the stolen money. 
According to Hertzberg and information presented in court, a hacker accessed the email system of a commercial furniture vendor for Children’s Health Care of Atlanta (CHOA) in early June 2023. 
Posing as a vendor employee, the unknown hacker contacted CHOA and updated the vendor’s bank account information on file for ACH payments. 
On June 13, 2023, the provided bank account belonged to Deabler. 
The hacker directed CHOA to wire the $5.3 million into Deabler’s bank account. 
Deabler, who is also a business owner, agreed to distribute the stolen money in exchange for a commission. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 1.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 2.0%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 15.4%WSBTV.com News Staff: 5.1%Rough Draft Atlanta: 3.3%Framing Effect15.4%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 3.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 15.4%WSBTV.com News Staff: 13.1%Rough Draft Atlanta: 4.2%Negativity Bias15.4%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%WSBTV.com News Staff: 2.3%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error6.9%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 2.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 2.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 2.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 15.4%WSBTV.com News Staff: 15.4%Rough Draft Atlanta: 3.3%Appeal to Emotion15.4%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 2.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 3.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WSBTV.com News Staff: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 11.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

246 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers29%attributed speech174writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageTheodore S. Hertzberg • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageMarlo Graham • 38 words • 0.0% coverageMarlo Graham • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Marlo Graham

100%flagged-word coverage
55 attributed words76% of attributed speech0% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.