Topic summary
37% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,511 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Money Laundering results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 3,024 hits . Analysis detected 17,009 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,532 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (11,559 of 16,562 topics). This Money Laundering is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group. Money Laundering
Topic details
Total words: 16,532
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles16.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst