Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,360 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financial Crime results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 810 hits. Analysis detected 6,185 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,440 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (13,108 of 15,447 topics). This Financial Crime is better (less manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group.
Financial Crime
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,440
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

15% percentile
025507510015.1% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos