Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,480 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Smith results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 702 hits . Analysis detected 4,488 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,920 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 36% (4,010 of 6,244 authors). This John Smith is better (less manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group. John Smith
Author details
Total words: 5,920
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.8% 10.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 11.9% 11.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.9%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst