Speaker summary
⁠80%2 analyzed articles/videos166 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marlo Graham results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 66.2% saturation with 109.904 hits. Analysis detected 279.466 faulty-reasoning hits from 166 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 31.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,478 of 28,364 speakers). This Marlo Graham is better (less manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Marlo Graham
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 166
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510049.0% percentile
31.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos166 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 66.2%66.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 28.9%28.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 33.5%33.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 66.2%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 33.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 26.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos