Keyword summary
74% 12 analyzed articles/videos 10,747 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Teenagers results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 4,614 hits . Analysis detected 42,291 faulty-reasoning hits from 43,661 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (27,171 of 34,832 keywords). This Teenagers is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group. Teenagers
Keyword details
Total words: 43,661
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score12 analyzed articles43.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst