Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sam Chapman results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 429 hits . Analysis detected 3,966 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This Sam Chapman is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Sam Chapman
Author details
Total words: 2,088
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 20.6% 20.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 18.1% 18.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 11.0% 11.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 13.6% 13.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 7.9% 7.9% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 7.5% 7.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.4% 13.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 18.1%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.7%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 13.6%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.9%, sitewide 11.1% False Dilemma: Author 11.0%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.4%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Author 7.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.4%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst