Keyword summary
25% 16 analyzed articles/videos 7,156 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Neill results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 6,037 hits . Analysis detected 28,390 faulty-reasoning hits from 42,772 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (32,196 of 34,788 keywords). This Sam Neill is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group. Sam Neill
Keyword details
Total words: 42,772
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score16 analyzed articles42.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst