Author summary
61% 1 analyzed article/video 654 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jimmy Briggs results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Biased Writer Voice , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 281 hits . Analysis detected 1,710 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,962 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,887 of 6,359 authors). This Jimmy Briggs is worse (more manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group. Jimmy Briggs
Author details
Total words: 1,962
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.3% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 14.3% 14.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 7.2% 7.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.3% 1.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.1% 6.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.2%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 14.3%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.2%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst