Keyword summary
0% 9 analyzed articles/videos 6,701 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Playoffs results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 2,625 hits . Analysis detected 21,960 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,705 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (27,349 of 35,766 keywords). This Playoffs is better (less manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group. Playoffs
Keyword details
Total words: 22,705
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score9 analyzed articles22.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst