Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 190 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andy Hurst results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Loss Aversion , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 336 hits . Analysis detected 1,248 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,554 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,465 of 6,374 authors). This Andy Hurst is worse (more manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group. Andy Hurst
Author details
Total words: 1,554
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.0% percentile 4.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 21.6% 21.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.0% 7.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 7.1% 7.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 21.6%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Loss Aversion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 7.0%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst