Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 850 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MICHAEL MAROT results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 348 hits . Analysis detected 2,921 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,550 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 86% (941 of 6,356 authors). This MICHAEL MAROT is worse (more manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group. MICHAEL MAROT
Author details
Total words: 2,550
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.2% percentile 5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 13.7% 13.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.0% 12.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.7% 11.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Special Pleading Sitewide 0.3% Author 3.4% 3.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.0%, sitewide 19.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 13.7%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 13.6%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Author 11.7%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Special Pleading: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst