Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 647 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Ahl results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 936 hits . Analysis detected 7,648 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,503 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,627 of 6,629 authors). This Jonathan Ahl is worse (more manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group. Jonathan Ahl
Author details
Total words: 6,503
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.4% percentile 3.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.8% 5.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 13.2% 13.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.4% 6.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.9% 12.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.9%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 13.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst