Keyword summary
44%9 analyzed articles/videos9,884 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Philosophy results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 2,827 hits. Analysis detected 28,527 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,392 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (33,223 of 37,536 keywords). This Philosophy is better (less manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group.
Philosophy

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

12% percentile
025507510011.5% percentile
1.6% BS Score9 analyzed articles33.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos

We’re Breaking Zeus’ Law88%
The Dispatch33%By Leah Libresco Sargeant97%7/25/2026, 6:45:00 AM
Why you don’t really get Homer28%
UnHerd69%By Thomas Peermohamed Lambert46%7/22/2026, 11:01:24 PM
How French Theory Lost Its Cool40%
Compact77%By Geoff Shullenberger40%7/21/2026, 11:00:40 AM
Recent DMT Hype Reawakens Old Philosophical Questions66%
Psychology Today43%By Liz Stillwaggon Swan PhD83%7/19/2026, 8:20:51 PM
The Patriarchal Mind Virus92%
Quillette64%By Alex Byrne0%7/18/2026, 10:38:50 PM
Liberalism, Heal Thyself38%
Persuasion40%By Marlene Laruelle50%7/14/2026, 3:55:06 PM
The British Statesman Who Recognized America's 'Fierce Spirit of Liberty'44%
Reason.com41%By Damon Root50%6/27/2026, 10:00:50 AM
Ole votes57%
Critical Section0%By Ole Eichhorn0%11/3/2024, 9:00:00 PM
regarding Dwell Time11%
Critical Section0%By Ole Eichhorn0%9/30/2024, 11:29:00 AM