Author summary
83% 1 analyzed article/video 1,020 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Liz Stillwaggon Swan PhD results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 528 hits . Analysis detected 3,916 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,060 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,581 of 6,628 authors). This Liz Stillwaggon Swan PhD is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group. Liz Stillwaggon Swan PhD
Author details
Total words: 3,060
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.2% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.8% 15.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 17.3% 17.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.9% 14.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 12.0% 12.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Author 4.3% 4.3% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 17.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.9%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 12.0%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 11.9%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Nature: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Burden of Proof: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Personal Incredulity: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst