Publication summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,331 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Critical Section results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 1,161 hits . Analysis detected 7,288 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,993 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 76% (100 of 408 publications). This Critical Section is worse (more manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 6,993
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.7% percentile 2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Publication 16.6% 16.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Publication 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 16.6%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 10.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 9.1%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Status Quo Bias: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Horn Effect: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 1.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst