Author summary
49%1 analyzed article/video1,529 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marlene Laruelle results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, False Dilemma, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 381 hits. Analysis detected 4,071 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 23% (4,812 of 6,244 authors). This Marlene Laruelle is better (less manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Marlene Laruelle
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
23%Marlene Laruelle (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,116
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

23% percentile
025507510022.9% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos