Author summary
46% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,823 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas Peermohamed Lambert results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 2,753 hits . Analysis detected 16,681 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,508 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 54% (2,963 of 6,361 authors). This Thomas Peermohamed Lambert is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group. Thomas Peermohamed Lambert
Author details
Total words: 13,508
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.4% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 20.4% 20.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.2% 10.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.2% 11.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.6% 12.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 20.4%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst