Keyword summary
0% 11 analyzed articles/videos 11,075 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Met Gala results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 6,867 hits . Analysis detected 40,638 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,411 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,801 of 37,536 keywords). This Met Gala is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group. Met Gala
Keyword details
Total words: 37,411
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score11 analyzed articles37.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 18.4% 18.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst