Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 542 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Melania-Trump results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.6% saturation with 554 hits . Analysis detected 2,315 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,571 of 37,530 keywords). This Melania-Trump is worse (more manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group. Melania-Trump
Keyword details
Total words: 2,168
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.8% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 25.6% 25.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 25.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst