Keyword summary
41% 22 analyzed articles/videos 6,757 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Carney results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 4,689 hits . Analysis detected 44,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 45,723 analyzed words across 22 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (27,381 of 34,832 keywords). This Mark Carney is better (less manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group. Mark Carney
Keyword details
Total words: 45,723
Article count: 22
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score22 analyzed articles45.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst