Keyword summary
73% 12 analyzed articles/videos 7,070 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lebron James results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 4,107 hits . Analysis detected 27,329 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,208 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (27,235 of 35,665 keywords). This Lebron James is better (less manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group. Lebron James
Keyword details
Total words: 28,208
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score12 analyzed articles28.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst