Keyword summary
62% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,722 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Johan Sebastian Duran Guerrero results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 2,014 hits . Analysis detected 15,838 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,870 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (17,997 of 34,560 keywords). This Johan Sebastian Duran Guerrero is better (less manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group. Johan Sebastian Duran Guerrero
Keyword details
Total words: 12,870
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.9% percentile 2.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.7% 15.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst