Keyword summary
65% 14 analyzed articles/videos 4,730 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Deal results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 4,890 hits . Analysis detected 44,968 faulty-reasoning hits from 39,957 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (25,110 of 37,536 keywords). This Iran Deal is better (less manipulative) than 66.90% of the peer group. Iran Deal
Keyword details
Total words: 39,957
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.1% percentile 2.3% BS Score14 analyzed articles40K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst