Keyword summary
52% 18 analyzed articles/videos 13,562 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Innovation results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 8,003 hits . Analysis detected 73,827 faulty-reasoning hits from 77,257 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (31,370 of 37,536 keywords). This Innovation is better (less manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group. Innovation
Keyword details
Total words: 77,257
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.4% percentile 1.8% BS Score18 analyzed articles77.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst