Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 230 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ernesto Aguilar results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 464 hits . Analysis detected 3,457 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,608 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.7% and a BS Rank of 96% (307 of 6,316 authors). This Ernesto Aguilar is worse (more manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group. Ernesto Aguilar
Author details
Total words: 1,608
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.2% percentile 10.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 28.9% 28.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 21.3% 21.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 25.3% 25.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 16.2% 16.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 19.4% 19.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.0% 8.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 7.2% 7.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 28.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 26.2%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 25.3%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 21.3%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 19.4%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 16.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 9.0%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 8.0%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 7.2%, sitewide 0.8% In-Group Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst