Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Dylan Matthews results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 297 hits. Analysis detected 2,243 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,306 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Dylan Matthews is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Dylan Matthews
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Dylan Matthews (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 5,306
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.9%0.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.7%3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos