Keyword summary
69%7 analyzed articles/videos5,182 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Stamps results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 2,785 hits. Analysis detected 27,305 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,099 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (23,011 of 34,527 keywords). This Food Stamps is better (less manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Food Stamps
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
34%Food Stamps (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

33% percentile
025507510033.4% percentile
2.3% BS Score7 analyzed articles25.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.1%11.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate