Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Raj Ananthanpillai results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Indoctrination, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 529 hits. Analysis detected 4,642 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,365 authors). This Raj Ananthanpillai is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Raj Ananthanpillai
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Raj Ananthanpillai (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,304
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 23.0%23.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 22.7%22.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.0%9.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.0%7.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 12.0%12.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 10.1%10.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 7.5%7.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 6.5%6.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 23.0%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 22.7%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Author 20.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Author 12.0%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Author 10.1%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Slippery Slope: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos