Keyword summary
48% 25 analyzed articles/videos 21,849 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ethics results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 7,955 hits . Analysis detected 70,057 faulty-reasoning hits from 93,627 analyzed words across 25 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (32,797 of 34,832 keywords). This Ethics is better (less manipulative) than 94.20% of the peer group. Ethics
Keyword details
Total words: 93,627
Article count: 25
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.8% percentile 1.4% BS Score25 analyzed articles93.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst