Keyword summary
81% 27 analyzed articles/videos 19,827 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Epstein Files results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 14,284 hits . Analysis detected 101,859 faulty-reasoning hits from 70,287 analyzed words across 27 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (19,227 of 34,825 keywords). This Epstein Files is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group. Epstein Files
Keyword details
Total words: 70,287
Article count: 27
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.8% percentile 2.7% BS Score27 analyzed articles70.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.8% 13.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst