Keyword summary
62% 101 analyzed articles/videos 45,702 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brooklyn results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 23,284 hits . Analysis detected 173,018 faulty-reasoning hits from 219,353 analyzed words across 101 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (32,886 of 35,675 keywords). This Brooklyn is better (less manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group. Brooklyn
Keyword details
Total words: 219,353
Article count: 101
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.8% percentile 1.5% BS Score101 analyzed articles219.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst