Keyword summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Austin Metcalf results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 1,948 hits . Analysis detected 11,781 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,554 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (35,183 of 37,536 keywords). This Austin Metcalf is better (less manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group. Austin Metcalf
Keyword details
Total words: 16,554
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.3% percentile 1.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles16.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst