Keyword summary
59% 16 analyzed articles/videos 4,870 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anti Weaponization Fund results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 5,780 hits . Analysis detected 41,562 faulty-reasoning hits from 38,066 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,383 of 37,536 keywords). This Anti Weaponization Fund is better (less manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group. Anti Weaponization Fund
Keyword details
Total words: 38,066
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score16 analyzed articles38.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst