Topic summary
39% 7 analyzed articles/videos 6,851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zoology results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 1,810 hits . Analysis detected 19,162 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,233 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 22% (12,609 of 16,091 topics). This Zoology is better (less manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group. Zoology
Topic details
Total words: 22,233
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles22.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst