Author summary
45% 2 analyzed articles/videos 261 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Arola results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 518 hits . Analysis detected 4,738 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,168 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 22% (5,224 of 6,628 authors). This Brian Arola is better (less manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group. Brian Arola
Author details
Total words: 6,168
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst