Topic summary
⁠78%5 analyzed articles/videos3,065 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Worker Rights results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 1,174 hits. Analysis detected 13,745 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,407 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (10,407 of 15,763 topics). This Worker Rights is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
Worker Rights
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510034.0% percentile
2.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos