Workers at Berkeley’s Graduate by Hilton hotel push to unionize 12%

By Tony Hicks10%

7/21/2026, 11:29:07 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 764 faulty-reasoning hits from 854 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 28.9% and a BS Rank of 12% (18,157 of 20,497 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 88.60% of the article peer group.

Workers at Berkeley’s Graduate by Hilton hotel are looking to form a union, saying the hotel in the Southside neighborhood is understaffed, they’re underpaid and they want better health benefits. 
More than a dozen workers and supporters chanted and marched with signs Friday on a late afternoon picket line. 
Representatives for the Unite Here Local 2 union say hotel employees went to management with a petition on July 10, formally requesting to unionize, and that the petition has been filed with the National Labor Relations Board. 
Union spokesperson Sonya Karabel said the petition was endorsed by a majority of the hotel’s approximately 40 non-management employees. 
A vote is scheduled for July 31. 
“They want better working conditions,” Karabel said. 
“They want a wage where they can actually afford to live in Berkeley or near Berkeley, and they want decent health care coverage.” 
Graduate by Hilton Berkeley, located at 2600 Durant Ave., just east of Telegraph Avenue, is part of Schulte Hospitality Group, owned by Nashville-based AJ Capital Partners, and Hilton, which owns Graduate Hotels. 
Formerly The Durant Hotel, the site is college-themed and has close ties with nearby UC Berkeley. 
A message left for hotel management went unreturned Friday. 
A desk worker said the manager was out for the day. 
Messages left for media representatives of Schulte Hospitality Group and AJ Capital Partners went unreturned. 
A Hilton spokesperson said on Sunday the company isn’t involved in any hotel labor issues and would pass a message to hotel management. 
Eric Crawford is a front desk supervisor who’s worked at the hotel for nearly four years. 
He said management seems receptive to workers’ demands, “so hopefully they’ll be able to work with us and hear what we have to say.” 
“It’s great working here, but I would like to have respect,” Crawford said. 
“At least for me, what’s important is to have respect and cheaper health care. 
I got the lowest tier of health care, which means I’m discouraged to go the doctor because it doesn’t cover much.” 
Crawford, who lives in Oakland, said hotel workers in San Francisco typically make more money than in Berkeley. 
“I’d like better wages; the cost of living in the area is really high. 
There’s room to grow; it could be better.” 
Irvin Garcia is a housekeeper who’s worked at the hotel for four years. 
“We just want better treatment,” said Garcia, who rolled his scooter while balancing a bowl of food on the picket line. 
“We’re human. 
We deserve better. 
There’s too much work for not [enough pay].” 
Picketers said they were frustrated by what happened in April at Hilton’s Graduate Hotel in downtown Palo Alto. 
Dozens of employees were suddenly laid off and replaced by temporary contract workers. 
The hospitality business saw a steep downturn during the pandemic, and the Bay Area’s recovery has been among the worst in the nation. 
Berkeley has been somewhat shielded by its college-town identity, faring better than San Francisco and Oakland, but decreased demand and rising costs have still plagued the city’s hotels. 
Its largest hotel, the 378-room DoubleTree by Hilton on the waterfront, stopped paying rent for its city-owned property last year and was at risk of default. 
Karabel said hotels have used the pandemic as an excuse to lay off workers in recent years, but she said business at Berkeley’s Graduate is strong. 
“UC Berkeley makes up a huge amount of its business, whether directly or indirectly,” she said. 
“The trends here really are very different than the rest of the industry.” 
Trevor Jackson, co-chair of the UC Berkeley Faculty Association, said he was invited to join the protest. 
He said he knows the university does a lot of business with the hotel and he wanted to support its workers. 
“I’m a professor of history and I will tell you history is on your side,” Jackson told picketers. 
“We got your back.” 
Maricela Castro told the group through a Spanish translator she has worked at the hotel for 30 years. 
She said she’s a room attendant who makes $23 an hour and feels like she does the work of two people. 
“What’s best for all of us,” Castro said. 
“That’s what I really want. 
I want to see this through because I want the best for all of us.” 
At least two UC Berkeley students joined the protesters. 
Catherine Boland is a junior and a member of Students for International Labor Solidarity. 
She said it’s important to support the workers, some of whom are students. 
“I think it’s really crucial for students to support their community, support their workers and make sure this hotel is organized, and their rights to unionize are respected,” Boland said. 
Karabel said the union has heard the hotel has hired a labor management consulting firm that has met with workers. 
She said the union wants to make sure no one threatens or intimidates employees. 
“I think you can see that the community is standing with us and saying they should respect workers’ right to decide for themselves about whether they want a union,” she said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.9%Tony Hicks: 4.0%Berkeleyside: 2.6%Confirmation Bias8.9%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Tony Hicks: 2.3%Berkeleyside: 3.3%Availability Heuristic4.8%This article: 1.9%Tony Hicks: 0.6%Berkeleyside: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic1.9%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Tony Hicks: 0.5%Berkeleyside: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias1.5%This article: 8.8%Tony Hicks: 2.9%Berkeleyside: 4.3%Framing Effect8.8%This article: 5.3%Tony Hicks: 1.8%Berkeleyside: 0.6%Loss Aversion5.3%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.7%Tony Hicks: 1.2%Berkeleyside: 2.8%Optimism Bias3.7%This article: 3.3%Tony Hicks: 1.1%Berkeleyside: 0.8%Pessimism Bias3.3%This article: 5.9%Tony Hicks: 2.0%Berkeleyside: 5.9%Negativity Bias5.9%This article: 1.8%Tony Hicks: 0.6%Berkeleyside: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Tony Hicks: 1.9%Berkeleyside: 0.9%In-Group Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Tony Hicks: 0.8%Berkeleyside: 7.8%Halo Effect2.5%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.1%Tony Hicks: 0.7%Berkeleyside: 1.1%Recency Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.0%Tony Hicks: 2.7%Berkeleyside: 4.0%Appeal to Authority4.0%This article: 3.5%Tony Hicks: 1.2%Berkeleyside: 1.1%False Dilemma3.5%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 1.0%Berkeleyside: 4.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.3%Tony Hicks: 2.3%Berkeleyside: 0.8%Bandwagon3.3%This article: 3.0%Tony Hicks: 1.1%Berkeleyside: 5.9%Appeal to Emotion3.0%This article: 3.0%Tony Hicks: 1.0%Berkeleyside: 0.5%Begging the Question3.0%This article: 1.5%Tony Hicks: 0.5%Berkeleyside: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.5%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.3%Tony Hicks: 2.4%Berkeleyside: 3.5%Anecdotal7.3%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 1.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 5.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 4.3%Tony Hicks: 1.4%Berkeleyside: 1.8%Indoctrination4.3%This article: 7.1%Tony Hicks: 2.4%Berkeleyside: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias7.1%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Hicks: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 2.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

854 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers59%attributed speech346writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageUnite Here Local 2 • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageSonya Karabel • 7 words • 100.0% coverageSonya Karabel • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageHilton • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageEric Crawford • 24 words • 0.0% coverageEric Crawford • 13 words • 0.0% coverageEric Crawford • 14 words • 0.0% coverageEric Crawford • 21 words • 0.0% coverageEric Crawford • 18 words • 0.0% coverageEric Crawford • 14 words • 0.0% coverageEric Crawford • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageIrvin Garcia • 21 words • 0.0% coverageIrvin Garcia • 2 words • 0.0% coverageIrvin Garcia • 3 words • 0.0% coverageIrvin Garcia • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageSonya Karabel • 26 words • 0.0% coverageSonya Karabel • 16 words • 0.0% coverageSonya Karabel • 13 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Jackson • 17 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Jackson • 21 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Jackson • 18 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Jackson • 4 words • 0.0% coverageMaricela Castro • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMaricela Castro • 21 words • 0.0% coverageMaricela Castro • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMaricela Castro • 5 words • 0.0% coverageMaricela Castro • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageCatherine Boland • 13 words • 0.0% coverageCatherine Boland • 30 words • 100.0% coverageSonya Karabel • 20 words • 0.0% coverageSonya Karabel • 14 words • 0.0% coverageSonya Karabel • 31 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Catherine Boland

100%flagged-word coverage
43 attributed words8.5% of attributed speech49% writer coverage
0%35.0%70.0%Indoctrination+69.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Catherine Boland: 69.8%69.8%Politically Left Leaning B+69.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Catherine Boland: 69.8%69.8%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.