Topic summary
30%11 analyzed articles/videos20,282 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Labor Organizing results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 4,607 hits. Analysis detected 58,418 faulty-reasoning hits from 75,634 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (15,331 of 16,562 topics). This Labor Organizing is better (less manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

7% percentile
02550751007.4% percentile
1.5% BS Score11 analyzed articles75.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.7%3.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate