Author summary
11% 1 analyzed article/video 854 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tony Hicks results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Anecdotal , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 4% saturation with 102 hits . Analysis detected 935 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,562 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 16% (5,601 of 6,629 authors). This Tony Hicks is better (less manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group. Tony Hicks
Author details
Total words: 2,562
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst