Speaker summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catherine Boland results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and In-Group Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 34.9% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 103 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,900 of 28,364 speakers). This Catherine Boland is better (less manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Catherine Boland
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510047.5% percentile
29.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 34.9%34.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 34.9%34.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 34.9%34.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 15.1%15.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%False Dilemma: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 6.9%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos