Topic summary
⁠80%2 analyzed articles/videos1,368 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Women In Stem results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 563 hits. Analysis detected 4,424 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,101 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,307 of 16,562 topics). This Women In Stem is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Women In Stem
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,101
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.9% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.7%9.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.7%13.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 6.2%6.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos