Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 781 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Winter results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 52.3% saturation with 1,226 hits . Analysis detected 4,857 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,343 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 9% and a BS Rank of 91% (1,542 of 16,562 topics). This Winter is worse (more manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group. Winter
Topic details
Total words: 2,343
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.7% percentile 9.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 52.3% 52.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 26.7% 26.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 8.4% 8.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 31.0% 31.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 19.4% 19.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 14.1% 14.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Negativity Bias: Topic 52.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 31.0%, sitewide 26.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 26.7%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.0% Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Red Herring: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst