Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos509 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Raymond Sanchez results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 40.5% saturation with 618 hits. Analysis detected 4,369 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,527 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.4% and a BS Rank of 96% (274 of 6,348 authors). This Raymond Sanchez is worse (more manipulative) than 95.70% of the peer group.
Raymond Sanchez
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
96%Raymond Sanchez (selected)12%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,527
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

96% percentile
025507510095.7% percentile
11.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 27.6%27.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 39.8%39.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 23.2%23.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 40.5%40.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 18.1%18.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 27.6%27.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 21.2%21.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 12.0%12.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 8.7%8.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 11.1%11.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 40.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 39.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 27.6%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Author 27.6%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 23.2%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 21.2%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Author 18.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 12.0%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 10.3%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate