Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 509 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Raymond Sanchez results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 40.5% saturation with 618 hits . Analysis detected 4,369 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,527 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.4% and a BS Rank of 96% (274 of 6,348 authors). This Raymond Sanchez is worse (more manipulative) than 95.70% of the peer group. Raymond Sanchez
Author details
Total words: 1,527
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.7% percentile 11.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 27.6% 27.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 39.8% 39.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 23.2% 23.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 40.5% 40.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 18.1% 18.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 27.6% 27.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 21.2% 21.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 12.0% 12.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 8.7% 8.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 11.1% 11.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 40.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 39.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 27.6%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 27.6%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 23.2%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 21.2%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 18.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 12.0%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 10.3%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 4.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst