Topic summary
⁠81%5 analyzed articles/videos3,030 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildlife Management results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 1,133 hits. Analysis detected 11,075 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,847 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,143 of 16,243 topics). This Wildlife Management is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group.
Wildlife Management
Topic details
Total words: 9,847
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510037.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.5%11.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.4%8.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos