KUER0%

Ben Lomond mountain goat herd is living their best lives a year after transplant46%

By Macy Lipkin0%

12/24/2025, 1:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 25.6% saturation with 166 hits. Analysis detected 467 faulty-reasoning hits from 649 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.9% and a BS Rank of 46% (11,965 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 54.70% of the article peer group.

The new hoofed residents of Ben Lomond Peak have had a good first year. 
It’s been 13 months since the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources brought in 10 mountain goats from the mountains east of Beaver to Ben Lomond, north of North Ogden. 
The goal was to help the Ben Lomond herd recover after transplants, hunting and years of harsh weather dwindled its numbers. 
So far, all 10 transplants are alive and well, said Box Elder District wildlife biologist Daniel Sallee. 
The first winter in a new location can be tough. 
Animals have to find safe places to avoid predators and find food and water, so Sallee expected to see one or two deaths. 
“It wouldn't have been concerning if we did, but it's really cool to see that they all made it,” he said. 
Plus, when Sallee went up the mountain in the fall, he saw one of the new arrivals nursing a baby. 
The transplants are easy to spot with their yellow ear tags and GPS collars. 
Some of the existing goats also have collars. 
The tracking helps biologists understand how the herds get along. 
Early on, the new goats kept to themselves. 
“Right after we let them go, they kind of all shotgunned across the ridge and then met up on the north side of Ben Lomond Peak,” Sallee said. 
Throughout the year, one goat wandered close to the Wyoming border, and another down near Interstate 15, before turning back home. 
Come late summer, Sallee said, the two groups of goats began interacting. 
They continue to get along  which you see in the population numbers. 
The herd has grown from about 30 individuals before the transplant to roughly 50 or 60 now, Sallee estimates, based on the new arrivals and the existing herd’s reproduction. 
Still, the state will continue to issue very few hunting permits so the population can grow. 
“Once they get up to about 100 individuals, we'll probably increase tags a little higher, just so they don't grow above that every year,” Sallee said. 
This winter’s unusual weather has allowed the mountain goats to remain at higher elevations than normal. 
Sallee expects there to still be plenty of vegetation due to warm weather and rain. 
“They're probably loving life up there right now at 9,000 feet and above, eating fresh grass,” he said. 
Mountain goat transplants are no easy feat. 
In 2024, the Division of Wildlife Resources contracted a helicopter crew to fly through the Tushar Mountains to look for goats. 
“They shoot a net that ensnares the animal, then they drop down, and a guy who’s called a mugger jumps out and untangles the goat from the net and puts a blindfold and hobbles on them,” Sallee said. 
Next, each goat was put in a transport bag on the end of a long line, and the animals were flown to the awaiting staff. 
The goats’ weight and body fat were measured. 
Each one got a GPS collar and a dose of sedatives for the ride up north. 
After a night in a holding facility to wait for blood test results, the goats were released on Ben Lomond. 
Sixteen goats captured from the same location were sent to Nevada to increase genetic diversity there. 
The effort is worth it to spread mountain goats out and keep populations healthy, Sallee said. 
It’s also fun for hikers and bikers to spot the fluffy, horned animals. 
For his part, Sallee loves watching baby mountain goats. 
“They race each other across, like, huge cliffs and head-butt and run down snow slides,” he said. 
“It's really cool to watch the kids playing up there.” 
As for the Ogdenite who first asked KUER about the mountain goats, he saw some from afar early this year and will keep his eyes peeled for more. 
Macy Lipkin is a Report for America corps member who reports for KUER in northern Utah. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Macy Lipkin: 2.0%KUER: 1.3%Anchoring Bias4.0%This article: 8.9%Macy Lipkin: 4.3%KUER: 3.4%Availability Heuristic8.9%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 8.8%Macy Lipkin: 2.4%KUER: 2.8%Confirmation Bias8.8%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.0%Macy Lipkin: 5.8%KUER: 7.4%Framing Effect2.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.8%KUER: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 1.4%Macy Lipkin: 1.2%KUER: 2.3%Halo Effect1.4%This article: 3.2%Macy Lipkin: 0.3%KUER: 0.5%Hindsight Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.9%KUER: 1.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 1.4%KUER: 1.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 5.6%KUER: 6.3%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 25.6%Macy Lipkin: 5.1%KUER: 4.4%Optimism Bias25.6%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.3%KUER: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 1.6%KUER: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Macy Lipkin: 2.1%KUER: 2.4%Pessimism Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.9%KUER: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 1.0%KUER: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 1.6%KUER: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 1.2%KUER: 1.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.4%KUER: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 1.7%KUER: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 8.9%Macy Lipkin: 3.9%KUER: 3.1%Anecdotal8.9%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 4.6%KUER: 4.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 2.0%Macy Lipkin: 4.6%KUER: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion2.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.4%KUER: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.6%KUER: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.4%KUER: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.3%KUER: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 1.5%KUER: 1.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 3.6%KUER: 4.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 2.0%Macy Lipkin: 2.2%KUER: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.9%KUER: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.3%KUER: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%

649 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.